Condition 6.

[Brian Christensen]

Condition 6
THE FOLLOWING NOTATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FACE OF AN ADDITIONAL NOTATION AND DISCLOSURE EXHIBIT MAP FOR THE PARCEL MAP: Pursuant to State Law, the property owner and any successors of interest whom benefit from the use of private roads shown on this map shall provide their pro-rata share to the costs of maintenance of this road, including any necessary repairs and snow removal upon demand by shared users of the road.

(Condition 5 is the formation of a Road Maintenance Agreement for Private Roads; form and content to be reviewed by the County Planning Dept. for approval).

The problem I have with Condition 6 is that it states "Pursuant to State Law".

Can anyone site the the specific code in which I could find this law?

Thanks.

[Jim Frame]

the property owner and any successors of interest whom benefit from

The problem I have with Condition 6 is the use of "whom" instead of "who."

.

[Brian Christensen]

Yeah, well we are talking about a "planning document".

My question is whether or not a state statute exists that defines the relationship between land owners with rights to a private roadway and their financial obligation to the roadway, as the condition states.

Where is it?

[D Ryan]

CIVIL CODE
SECTION 840-848

845. (a) The owner of any easement in the nature of a private right-of-way, or of any land to which any such easement is attached, shall maintain it in repair.
(b) If the easement is owned by more than one person, or is attached to parcels of land under different ownership, the cost of maintaining it in repair shall be shared by each owner of the easement or the owners of the parcels of land, as the case may be, pursuant to the terms of any agreement entered into by the parties for that purpose. If any owner who is a party to the agreement refuses to perform or fails after demand in writing to pay the owner's proportion of the cost, an action for specific performance or
contribution may be brought against that owner in a court of competent jurisdiction by the other owners, either jointly or severally.
(c) In the absence of an agreement, the cost shall be shared proportionately to the use made of the easement by each owner. Any owner of the easement, or any owner of land to which the easement is attached, may apply to any court where the right-of-way is located and that has jurisdiction over the amount in controversyfor the appointment of an impartial arbitrator to apportion the cost. The application may be made before, during, or after performance of the maintenance work. If the arbitration award is not accepted by all of the owners, the court may enter a judgment determining the proportionate liability of each owner. The judgment may be enforced as a money judgment by any party against any other party to the action.
(d) In the event that snow removal is not required under subdivision (a) or under any independent contractual or statutory duty, an agreement entered into pursuant to subdivision (b) to maintain the easement in repair shall be construed to include snow removal within the maintenance obligations of the agreement if all of the following exist:
(1) Snow removal is not expressly precluded by the terms of the agreement.
(2) Snow removal is necessary to provide access to the properties served by the easement.
(3) Snow removal is approved in advance by the property owners or their elected representatives in the same manner as provided by the agreement for repairs to the easement.
(e) The provisions of this section do not apply to rights-of-way held or used by railroad common carriers subject to the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission.

[cals6406]

Provides for the use of an additionional sheet for the inclusion of additional information that is not intended to affect record tiltle interest, if required by local ordinance. If this is the law being referred to, be sure to add all the disclaimers allowed to you by this Section of code.

[Brian Christensen]

Thank you gentlemen. This is a new one for me. I did not doubt the existence of the law I just could not find it, and usually when I place a statement that starts with "Pursuant to", I like to back it up with the code.

Keith, a statement to that affect graces all of my additional information.

I hate Parcel Maps!