Use of "PLS"

Post Reply
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Use of "PLS"

Post by RAM »

Just for fun Scott,

Can a pre 82 RCE use the title "PLS"?

Is this a test? Maybe!
E_Page
Posts: 2138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

8708: ... only persons licensed under this chapter shall be entitled to take and use the titles "licensed land surveyor", "professional land surveyor", or "land surveyor", or any combination of these words, phrases, or abbreviations thereof.


Pre 82 Civil engineers are exempted from the licensing requirement under this chapter, but they are not licensed under this chapter (Chapter 15 of the B&P Code). They are licensed under Chapter 7 of the B&P Code.

So, No, they may not use any of the titles mentioned under Section 8708.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
Ric7308
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:50 pm

You Guys come up with the strangest questions sometimes...

Post by Ric7308 »

While I had my own viewpoint, I inquired with the all knowing Nancy and surprisingly, she didn't begin her response with "It depends..." It was a very quick answer (Maybe even detected a sore point...hmm).

A Pre-1982 Civil Engineer is authorized to perform land surveying services, but not licensed as a Land Surveyor pursuant to the PLS Act. Which means that the title "PLS" can only be used by an individual licensed under this act.

What do you guys have next?
Ric
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

Man I love having you all do my homework for me.
E_Page
Posts: 2138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

What prize do we get to claim Russ? Are you buying dinner & drinks or some such?
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

Ice cream for your wife and kids.
E_Page
Posts: 2138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

Great! I'll send them your way.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
User avatar
PLS7393
Posts: 930
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
Contact:

Post by PLS7393 »

I was hoping this was the start of a new contest called . . .

Stump the Board, heheheee!!!

But then you can't stump the Board, even if their answer isn't the same interpretation as mine. Their assistance and info is always good information!

Thanks!
Keith Nofield, Professional Land Surveying
PLS 7393
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

Intertesting, I will have to think some more or get Evan to do some more homework for me. I can see the point, but does that allow a pre 82 RCE to use "PLS" in their letter head?
Ric7308
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:50 pm

Post by Ric7308 »

Greg: "He goes on to explain that pre-82 engineers often introduce themselves as "surveyors" to their clients and isn't that ok, too?"

Maybe they don't want to be known as an Engineer! Just kidding. Actually, I know an LS that was a CE first and when he obtained his LS license, he rarely refers to himself as an Engineer. Even changed how he lists his occupation in tax returns. Now there is a convert!

As previous comments offered, there is a difference between being "exempt" and being "licensed". I guess technically speaking, a Pre-82 CE could refer to themselves as "a Civil Engineer with additional authorization to practice Land Surveying".

Interesting enough, BPELS does have a legal opinion related to Section 6747 which could be an indication on how this issue would be interpreted, which exempts people from having to be licensed as electrical or mechanical engineers for the "performance of engineering work," but does not include the right to use restricted titles.

Also, has anyone noticed under Section 6704, that Photogrammetric Surveyors have the right to use the title of "Consulting Engineer"? Interesting...wonder how that got in there?
E_Page
Posts: 2138
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

I can understand why an engineer might want to pass himself off as a Surveyor, but why would a Surveyor, even a photogrammetric one, want to pass oneself off as an engineer???

Egad! Perish the thought!

;-)


I don't really think there is anymore homework to do, Russ. I just go back to Section 8708, which is very clear "... only persons licensed under this chapter..." Last time I checked, engineers were not licensed under this chapter.


Greg,

Remember that your co-worker is an engineer. You may have to read this very slowly to him. Even then, he may not be able to understand it unless you can somehow tabulate the information in Section 8708, Section 8731 (which refers back to the chapter that engineers are licensed under), Article 4 of Chapter 7, and Article 4 of Chapter 15, along with the definitions of the phrases "exempt from" and "licensed under", the terms "right", "privilege", and "title", and get an ANSI standard assigned to it.

Most engineers can understand even fairly complicated information if it is adequately tabulated for them and can be found in a standards manual.

(for any thin-skinned snivel engineers who may read this, lighten up, I'm just yankin' your chain)
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
Post Reply