Surveyor to Recorder for Record of Survey?

Do you feel that the cost of the RS County Surveyor review exceeds the value added?

Yes. I'd appreciate a more efficient system in which surveyors could bypass the time and expense of CS review
25
46%
No. I enjoy paying through the nose in the name of protecting the public for the privilege of performing a professional service
29
54%
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
Peter Ehlert
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:40 pm
Location: N31°43', W116°39'
Contact:

Re: Surveyor to Recorder for Record of Survey?

Post by Peter Ehlert »

Polls give wrong answers, almost always.
We all remember the polls from this time two years ago, most of us were shocked.

IF This Poll was:
1. I want Direct to Recorder
2. I want the existing County Surveyor review.
then the result could be quite different.
Personally, it took a page or two of comments before I decided to chose #1 (my short version)

Dave and Phil: I agree with most of what you both have to say.
I regret that I was unable to attend the OC meeting with the Az. presenter.
Videos are hard for me, and I have not taken the time to see it YET.
https://www.facebook.com/OC.CLSA/videos ... 529580290/

I practiced in Az. for about 14 months, 2007-8. I have "retired" my Az. licence.
Observation:
Direct to Recorder worked very will with few exceptions:
a few maps were overly simple, like tax map...
and a few were poor reproduction (partly illegible).
The vast majority were rather good, "California Quality"
Peter Ehlert PLS 5116 (retired)
Post Reply