Martin's Beach

Post Reply
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

User avatar
LS_8750
Posts: 1166
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Sonoma
Contact:

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by LS_8750 »

Coastal Commission Shakedown
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Indeed. The CCC trial is going on here in San Diego this week.

See: http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/new ... story.html

Several years ago I was involved with Naiman and Simms when that corruption trial went down. I worked on their properties and assisted them with coastal permitting until it got crazy.

See:

http://articles.latimes.com/1992-06-26/ ... an-robbins

https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/200 ... se/?page=3&
User avatar
PLS7393
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
Contact:

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by PLS7393 »

Good reading right here, at least for us northern CA peeps.
I did hear this on the news and meant to follow up, so thanks for the link.
Gary Schenk
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:01 am
Location: Huntington Beach

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by Gary Schenk »

mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Just saw that story also. Thanks
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

And this is why the constitution is worth fighting for.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by Jim Frame »

The article is a political screed rather than a dispassionate discussion of the issues. Management of the coastline as a public trust is long-established in California law, and private property rights are not unequivocally superior. It's not about left and right, it's about the balance between public and private interests. The Martin's Beach case presents a complex set of competing considerations, and the legal outcome is hardly a foregone conclusion.
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Well said!
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Jim, See the attached.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Warren Smith
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Sonora

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by Warren Smith »

I notice that the Recorder collected the $75 SB2 surcharge in addition to the normal recording fees for the Judgment.
Warren D. Smith, LS 4842
County Surveyor Emeritus
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Every chance they can get! They hit me for an easement deed.
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by Jim Frame »

My understanding is that Khosla still hasn't applied for a development permit per Coastal Commission requirements, and is instead appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, which hasn't (yet) granted cert in the matter. The saga continues...
mpallamary
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm

Re: Martin's Beach

Post by mpallamary »

Yes, he did petition the SCOTUS.
Post Reply