Proposed change to 8771 of LS Act ?

Post Reply
Oxnard Kurt
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Oxnard, California

Proposed change to 8771 of LS Act ?

Post by Oxnard Kurt »

Section 8771 of the LS Act says among other things " .....They (monuments)shall be reset in the surface of new construction ....."

As a long time Caltrans Surveyor, I think it is smarter to sub monuments at least .3 to .5 feet to avoid being destroyed by a simple grind and overlays that happens every so many years. So what if I have to dig them up once in a while, at least they are there, of record, and I don't have to reset them.

I propose eliminating the words "in the surface of" and replacing with "before".

What do you think ?
E_Page
Posts: 2144
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

A monument well satisfies the "surface" requirement.

The purpose of that provision is so that one does not need to tear up the road surface in order to recover a monument. It's a matter of safe road conditions and also of worker safety.

I see no need to modify the provision.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
bruce hall
Posts: 645
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:18 pm
Location: huntington beach, orange county, california

Post by bruce hall »

I don't care for your proposed modifications, OK. As a looooooonnnnnnnnngggggg
time surveyor who has searched for, uncovered, dug up, not found, found (and any combination thereof) a whole sh$tload of survey monuments in the pavement, I want those suckers at the surface or in a well.

I want to be out of the driving area, road median, roadway ASAP. I don't want to hang out digging for something. It's a safety issue more than anything.

And if the monuments are located, tied out, and reset like they are supposed to be, they really won't be destroyed, but perpetuated.

And if you don't want to reset them, I will, for a fee.
Bruce Hall Land Surveyor No. 4743
5732 Middlecoff Drive
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
714 840 4380
User avatar
Dave Karoly, PLS
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 6:26 pm
Location: Sacramento

Post by Dave Karoly, PLS »

Consider this my official "like" of Bruce's post!
"Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines." -General "Buck" Turgidson
User avatar
Ian Wilson
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:58 am
Location: Bay Area

Post by Ian Wilson »

Ditto Bruce & Dave!
Ian Wilson, P.L.S. (CA / NV / CO)
Alameda County Surveyor
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Post by Jim Frame »

It's not an either/or situation: §8771 specifies that the monument be set in a well ("a suitable monument box placed thereon"), unless witness monuments are used.

I ignore the provision when the corner isn't in AC pavement. For lot and block corners and the like that land on concrete, I use the 1" brass disks that you drive into a plastic sleeve. If you use the application-specific drill bit, they're quick to install, durable, and look pretty nice to boot.

.
Jim Frame
Frame Surveying & Mapping
609 A Street
Davis, CA 95616
framesurveying.com
Oxnard Kurt
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:22 pm
Location: Oxnard, California

Post by Oxnard Kurt »

I was sort of playing devil's advocate when I made this post. We were have a discussion about this subject between three PLS's at my office. I said " OK, what if...."

Although I have been with Caltrans now for nearly 20 years, I have only been liscensed for 9. I know I still have a lot to learn. I appreciate your input !

Thanks, Oxnard Kurt
Post Reply