Parcel A not described as Parcel A, but M&B.
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:24 pm
Situation: There two parcels, A & B of a Parcel Map (PM). The original deed for one is a Metes and Bounds (M&B) (a gift deed) with no reference to the PM but the geometry is identical to the map, and recorded a month prior to when the PM recorded (1971). The other deed cited “Parcel B of PMâ€. There was no owner’s statement on the map. Back in 1971, did owners need to sign the Parcel Maps? It seems like no parcel maps prior to 1972 had an owner’s statement on them.
Did the M&B illegally subdivide land since it occurred before the PM recorded? If the PM was approved, then the deed (that recorded a month prior to the PM) may not have been done illegally?
Are the owners of the M&B description senior to the deed that references the actual PM?
I’ve seen this situation a couple of times, (a M&B but no reference to the PM that created the lot).
Did the M&B illegally subdivide land since it occurred before the PM recorded? If the PM was approved, then the deed (that recorded a month prior to the PM) may not have been done illegally?
Are the owners of the M&B description senior to the deed that references the actual PM?
I’ve seen this situation a couple of times, (a M&B but no reference to the PM that created the lot).