Congratulations new Land Surveyors!

boydston
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:36 pm

Post by boydston »

I think I just about wore out the boards licence lookup prompt...but today is a good day.

Scott Boydston
PLS 8835
Rob_LS
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:56 pm

Post by Rob_LS »

Order of assigning numbers - search previous posts - thsi was explained last April...
Mojavegreen
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:44 am
Location: San Bernardino County

Post by Mojavegreen »

Congratulations Scott and all the other new licensed surveyors. Good work!!

Gary Lewis
PLS 8601
Apple Valley
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

It looks like the License Lookup was updated, now the last number is 8884. I believe appeals were on 8/11?? Have they been approved then?
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

I hadn't seen that anyone has posted this info: Exam Statistics for April 2011

Land Surveying Exams

National PLS
Tested 122
Passed 69
Pass % 56.56%
Failed 53
Fail % 43.44%

State-Specific PLS
Tested 334
Passed 72
Pass % 21.56%
Failed 262
Fail % 78.44%
Cutscore 220
Possible 400
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

All of you new folks congrats. Be a voice in your future, see the Post "Be a Voice" and participate in the future of the profession. Lets see if we can get all 4000 that have viewed this post to participate.

Thanks
User avatar
Stephen Johnson
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:48 am

Post by Stephen Johnson »

What is the new High Number?

About this time 20 years ago, it was in the High 6300's or low 6400's. IMSM.

BTW, I got mine that year in March. The rest of the bunch had to wait till June.
Stephen Johnson, PLS 6303

Politicians should serve two terms. One in office and one in prison.

Stop Repeat Offenders!!! Quit ReElecting Them!!!
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

It appears 8884 is the current "high".
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
Hi-Note
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:32 pm

Post by Hi-Note »

I can't imagine that the appeals would have been processed and the database updated within 8 days of the appeal date.

I am still waiting for the results of my appeal.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

That's why I was surprised that the numbers 8882, 8883, and 8884 were added on there later.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
Josh Tatman
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Orange County

Post by Josh Tatman »

pls7809 wrote:That's why I was surprised that the numbers 8882, 8883, and 8884 were added on there later.
Maybe they forgot to turn in their take-home test when they applied, about the only thing I can think of.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

I forgot about that. Congratulations nonetheless!
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
User avatar
Stephen Johnson
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:48 am

Post by Stephen Johnson »

Josh Tatman wrote:Maybe they forgot to turn in their take-home test when they applied, about the only thing I can think of.
When I took it the whole thing was a take home test for me. 21 Years ago, COMITY/RECIPROCITY, already been licensed in another state for 3 years. A couple of years later they changed the rules again.
Stephen Johnson, PLS 6303

Politicians should serve two terms. One in office and one in prison.

Stop Repeat Offenders!!! Quit ReElecting Them!!!
everstudy
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:58 am

Post by everstudy »

Anyone know how long it takes for them to 'grade' the appeals? I've heard that it could be in November, but there were only about 17 of us in Riverside appealling.
E_Page
Posts: 2144
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
Location: El Dorado County

Post by E_Page »

The appeals grading generally happens 2 to 4 weeks after the examinees' appeals session. Results then have to be approved by the Board at their next regular meeting.

I expect that those results will likely be available shortly after the September 8 Board meeting with notifications going out mid-month.

The only reason I can think of why they might be delayed until November would be if there was something preventing the Board staff from scheduling appeals grading before the end of August.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
User avatar
Steve Martin
Posts: 632
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:24 pm
Location: Hayward

Passed on appeal

Post by Steve Martin »

James Burke of EBMUD passed upon appeal and received his notice Saturday.
Congrtulations to LS 8889!

Jim credits Chris Bateman's letter posted on this forum and the Sacramento Chapter LS appeal strategy seminar with helping him to use his 8 hours wisely and formulate sound arguments.
Steve Martin, LS 7264
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

Looks like the new high LS number is 8898 after appeals. Congrats to the new new PLS's in CA.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
User avatar
BeachBum
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:24 pm
Location: Santa Cruz
Contact:

Post by BeachBum »

Steve Martin wrote:James Burke of EBMUD passed upon appeal and received his notice Saturday.
Congrtulations to LS 8889!

Jim credits Chris Bateman's letter posted on this forum and the Sacramento Chapter LS appeal strategy seminar with helping him to use his 8 hours wisely and formulate sound arguments.
I am happy that letter is still able to do some good ... Sorry I have been absent during the appeal study time. Congrats to all my apellate brothers and sisters!!
Christopher Bateman
PLS 8091
Post Reply